hd_app.gif (8040 bytes)

CCE Home  |  loyola.wired  |  Search  |  Comments  



G
uidelines for Completion of Quality Improvement Project Report

If you are reporting a quality improvement project, begin with item 1 below and complete all items for which information is available. If a one or more steps have not been finished please mark as "to be completed".   Graphical display of data should be attached to the report form.

It is recommended that reports be submitted in electronic form (via email, if possible) to William Barron, M.D. or LuAnn Vis, Center for Clinical Effectiveness.

1. Opportunity / AIM statement with Measurable Goal

  • The opportunity or problem statement is a brief, clear description of the issue studied.
  • The desired outcome is the specific, measurable objective or goal of the project.

Example:

Approximately 70% of patients with neutropenia and fever receive antibiotics more than one hour after ordering. This delay leads to an increase in mortality and greater use of hospital resources. The goal of this project is to achieve administration of antibiotics in this patient population within 60 minutes following a physician order and to thereby reduce mortality, length of stay, and charges per admission.

2. Most likely causes

  • Describe the cause(s) thought to be responsible for the opportunity /problem noted above.
  • Describe the manner in which the most likely cause was identified, e.g. data, literature, opinion of local experts, etc.

Example:

Nurses and physicians caring for patients with neutropenic fever at Loyola believed that delays in antibiotic administration were due to (1) suboptimal accessibility of antibiotics and (2) a lack of awareness of staff about the serious consequences of delayed antibiotic administration.

3. Potential Solutions and Data Needed for Evaluation

  • Utilizing the most-likely causes identified in step 2, list potential solutions that may result in the desired outcome(s). Such solutions may be based on experience of others, published reports, and/or best guesses of those with knowledge of the issue. Following this, choose one or more solutions that can be reasonable instituted.

Example:

(1) Develop a definition of neutropenic fever

(2) Develop a practice guideline for use of antibiotics in patients with neutropenic fever

(3) Develop a policy for use of the pneumatic tube system for antibiotic delivery

(4) Educate physicians and nurses about neutropenic fever and the new guidelines for antibiotic administration

  • For each solution to be implemented, identify the data needed to determine if the change has lead to an improvement.  Data collected should be the absolute minimum and of importance to patients and to the people doing the work. Once the required data elements have been specified, the source of these data must be identified or developed.

Example:

(1) Quarterly reports of all patients admitted with neutropenic fever (CCE FORCE database)

(2) Charges and length of stay for patients admitted with neutropenic fever (CCE FORCE database)

(3) Time between antibiotic order and administration (chart review)

(4) Mortality rate (chart review)

4.Solutions Implemented

  • List the solutions implemented and date of implementation.

5a. Results - Attach data in graph form.

  • Present quantitative results, including statistical analysis if appropriate, of the most important study outcomes. It is strongly suggested that results be presented in graphical format to highlight changes over time (contact the CCE at 6-3290 if assistance with graphical presentation and/or statistical analysis is desired). Attach no more than three additional pages to present results. Please avoid inclusion of spreadsheets containing large amounts of data – such information is often very difficult to interpret.

5b. Data Analysis

  • Provide a narrative description of the findings to accompany each of the graphics presented above.

Example:

(1) Prior to implementation of the new approach 20% of patients on the inpatient unit received antibiotics within 1 hour. Following implementation 85% of these patients received antibiotics within this time frame.

(2) Length of stay decreased from an average of 6.0 to 5.0 days and charges declined from $13,808/case to 11,481/case.

(3) Mortality rate for neutropenic fever decreased from 8% to 4%.

6. Conclusions and Next Steps

  • Describe, based on the data analysis, whether or not the change(s) made produced the desired improvement and what next steps you plan. Next steps may include but are not limited to the following:
  • Broad implementation if the initial change was done on a small scale
  • Attempt at another solution if the project was not successful
  • Continued data collection to monitor whether the observed improvement is sustained
  • No additional activity is planned.  If this is the case, please provide rationale for ending the project.

Example:

Following implementation of a program to expedite administration of antibiotics to patients with neutropenia and fever, mortality and resource utilization improved dramatically.

Next steps include expanding data collection and analysis to the emergency department and home care settings. Data collection and analysis on the inpatient unit will continue to determine if the progress made is sustained.

about.gif (5619 bytes)approach.gif (4551 bytes)news.gif (4278 bytes)tools.gif (4473 bytes)projects2.gif (4838 bytes)links.gif (4786 bytes)



www.luhs.org

Last reviewed: Dec. 13, 2006

©1995-2005 Loyola University Health System. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer | Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy